With the general elections looming, the debate over a lower voting age has split not only the political world, but also the academic world and the general public.
Numerous arguments have been proposed which look at various elements including the considered legal age of maturity and other legal opportunities for young people. Many believe that if young people are mature enough to fight for their own country then they should be able to have their say on political matters.
Following the Scottish Independence referendum, arguments have begun to focus on how a lower voting age in other countries correlates with the level of turnout.
Dr Andrew Mycock, Reader of politics at the University of Huddersfield, said: “nearly all democracies retain the voting age at 18 or above. There is a lack of evidence to suggest that lowering the voting age on its own has increased turnout in countries such as Austria or Norway or youth political engagement.”
The Scottish Independence referendum showed that when the voting age was lowered to 16, turnout soared to 84% from 50.4% in 2011. “The Scottish independence referendum did see large numbers of young people engaged and at times their passion and commitment was breathtaking.”
“It would have been surprising if they had not engaged considering the campaign went for two years. There is a need for a more considered approach where we look at the evidence from across the world as well as in the UK before we lower the voting age.”
Proposals have suggested more opportunities are necessary to engage the younger population in politics, instead of introducing a lower voting age. UK Uncut and the Youth Parliament are just two of many organisations which have been introduced to enable young people to gain an understanding of politics. “We need to go beyond political parties and encourage young people to set the political agenda on their own,” he added.
Miliband has promised that the voting age will be lowered to 16 if Labour wins the election in May. This is a decision which will affect over 1.5 million 16 and 17 year olds who are currently unable to vote; which many feel prevents them from having their say.
Mycock suggested that lowering the voting age is a “simple solution to a more complex issue”. The voting age has before been altered in 1969 when it was lowered to 18. However, he suggests this change was brought on due to a “transformation in how British society understood the citizenship rights and responsibilities of young citizens”.
“Lowering the voting age may have a positive influence in the short-term but if it is introduced without full consideration of its ramifications it will simply push youth political disengagement to an earlier age.”